Contact Us
Categories
- Litigation
- Medical Malpractice
- House Bill 333
- Senate Bill 79
- locum tenens
- Senate Bill 4
- Physician Prescribing Authority
- HIPAA
- Chronic Pain Management
- Prescription Drugs
- "Two Midnights Rule"
- 340B Program
- Hospice
- Kentucky minimum wage
- Minimum wage
- Skilled Nursing Facilities (“SNFs”)
- Uncategorized
- EHR Systems
- ICD-10
- Primary Care Physicians ("PCPs")
- Electronic Health Records (“EHR")
- Drug Screening
- Urinalysis
- Mental Health Care
- KASPER
- HIPAA Risk Assessment
- Office for Civil Rights ("OCR")
- Affordable Insurance Exchanges
- Fraud
- Health Care Fraud
- Stark Laws
- Qui Tam
- Kentucky’s Department for Medicaid Services
- Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure
- Physician Assistants
- Compliance
- Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (OIG)
- Federally Qualified Health Centers (“FQHCs”)
- HPSA
- Pharmacists
- Rural Health Centers (“RHCs”)
- Telehealth
- Accountable Care Organizations (“ACO”)
- Certificate of Need ("CON")
- Fee for Service
- Part D
- Anti-Kickback Statute
- Affordable Care Act
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”)
- Data Breach
- Electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI)
- False Claims Act
- Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act)
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
- Hospitals
- Medicaid
- Medicare
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”)
- Health Professional Shortage Area ("HPSA")
- Medical Staff By-Laws
- Medically Underserved Area ("MUA")
- Rural Health Clinic
- Alternative Payment Models
- Charitable Hospitals
- HRSA
- Limited Services Clinics
- Mid-Level Practitioners
- Kentucky Board of Nursing
- American Telemedicine Association (“ATA”)
- Criminal Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”)
- Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (“HEAT”)
- Qualified Health Care Centers (“FQHC”)
- Telemedicine
- Hydrocodone
- United States ex. Rel. Kane v. Continuum Health Partners
- Webinar
- APRNs
- Chain and Organization System (“PECOS”)
- Jimmo v. Sebelius
- Maintenance Standard
- Overpayments
- Vitas Innovative Hospice Care
- Agreed Order
- Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA")
- Hinchy v. Walgreen Co.
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California
- Emergency Rooms
- Enrollment
- Re-validation
- Kentucky Senate Bill 7
- Medicare Part D
- Minors
- Texting
- Chiropractic services
- Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (“CLIA”)
- Ophthalmological services
- Physician Compare website
- All-Payer Claims Database ("APCD")
- Compliance Officer
- Essential Health Benefits
- ICD-9
- 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (“PFS”)
- 501(c)(3)
- Chronic Care Management
- Compounding
- CPR
- Drug Quality and Security Act (“DQSA”)
- House Bill 3204
- New England Compounding Center ("NECC")
- Outsourcing facility
- Sustainable Growth Rate (“SGR”)
- Appeal
- Dispenser
- Kindred v. Cherolis
- Long-term care communities
- National Drug Code ("NDC")
- Ping v. Beverly Enterprises
- Power of Attorney ("POA")
- Prescriber
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Food and Drug Administratio
- HealthCare.gov
- Mobile medical applications ("apps")
- NADSA Conference
- National Institutes of Health
- State Health Plan
- Cadillac tax
- Denied Claims
- Federation of State Medical Boards (“FSMB”)
- Grace Period
- Individual mandate
- Kentucky Medical Practice Act
- Kynect
- Model Policy for the Appropriate Use of Social Media and Social Networking in Medical Practice (“Model Policy”)
- Physician Payments
- Qualified Health Plan ("QHP")
- Social Media
- Spousal coverage
- UPS
- Affinity Health Plan
- Community health needs assessment (“CHNA”)
- Condition of Participation ("CoP")
- Form 4720
- Home Medical Equipment Providers
- Inpatient Care
- Licensure Requirements
- Long-Term Care Providers ("LTC")
- Nonprofit hospitals
- Personal Service Entities
- Arbitration
- Department of Medicaid Services’ (“DMS”)
- Home Health Prospective Payment System
- Hospitalists
- LLC v. Sutter
- Low-utilization payment adjustment ("LUPA")
- Medicare Shared Saving Program (MSSP)
- Network provider agreement
- Nonroutine medical supplies conversion factor (“NRS”)
- Payors
- Quality reporting
- Upcoding
- “Superuser”
- "Plan of Correction"
- Daycare centers
- Division of Regulated Child Care
- Employer Mandate
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Health Professional Shortage Areas (“HPSA”)
- Intermediate Sanctions Agreement
- Kentucky Health Benefit Exchange
- Licensed practical nurses (LPN)
- Nurse practitioners (NP)
- Physician Recruitment
- Physician shortages
- Registered nurses (RN)
- Residency Programs
- Statement of Deficiency ("SOD")
- Audit
- Decertification
- EHR vendor
- False Billings
- List of Excluded Individuals and Entities
- Meaningful use incentives
- Medicare Administrative Coordinators
- Medicare Benefit Policy Manual
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (“ONC”)
- Part A
- Part B
- Provider Self Disclosure Protocol
- Self-Disclosure Protocol
- Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
- Call Coverage
- Doe v. Guthrie Clinic
- Employer Group Health Plans
- ERISA
- Group Purchasing Organizations ("GPO")
- Health Reform
- House Bill 104
- Patient Privacy
- Trade Association Group Coverage
- Business Associate Agreements
- Business Associates
- Kentucky House Bill 217
- Patient Autonomy
- Personal Health Information
- Autism/ASD
- Kentucky House Bill 159
- Senate Bill 39
- Senate Finance Committee Report
- State Medicaid Expansion
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA")
- Kentucky Primary Care Centers (“PCCs”)
- Managed Care Organizations (“MCOs”)
- Compliance Programs
- Critical Access Hospitals (“CAHs”)
- Essential Health Benefits (“EHBs”)
- Medicare Audit Improvement Act of 2012
- Recovery Audit Contractors (“RAC”)
- Small Business Health Options Program (“SHOP”)
- Sunshine Act
- Center for Disease Control
- Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”)
- Abuse and Waste
- Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan programs (“CO-OPS”)
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services
- Kentucky Health Care Co-Op
- Kentucky Health Cooperative (“KYHC”)
- Kentucky Pharmacists Association
- House Bill 1
- Kentucky “Pill Mill Bill”
- Free Conference Committee Report
- Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program
- House Bill 4
- Pain Management Facilities
- Employee Agreement
- Health Insurance
- Healthcare Regulation
- Health Care Law
McBrayer Blogs
An Analysis of Urinalysis—Considerations for Health Providers
Urinalysis, also referred to as urine drug screening, is an important procedure that health providers use for several reasons: to monitor patients’ medication compliance, detect drug abuse, or identify the presence of disease. There are numerous implications that accompany a urinalysis examination though, and health providers are sometimes left wondering if they should hand over the cup to patients.
First, physicians and providers should anticipate the entire continuum of possible test results, including results outside the original purpose of the urinalysis. For example, an ob-gyn may perform a urinalysis during a pregnant patient’s routine prenatal visit to determine hormone levels but test results may also indicate recent patient drug use. Further, if the results reveal that the mother is using marijuana, the ob-gyn must be prepared with how to deal with that information. A patient, even a consenting one, may feel uncomfortable or violated if the provider discusses what the test reveals outside than agreed-upon test purpose. Providers should clearly communicate why they are testing the urine and advise the patient that the test can reveal other things. This can be accomplished through intake forms, treatment contracts, etc as well as communications informing the patient through the course of treatment but it is advisable that the provider discloses the purpose and potential outcomes before testing.
Further, the principle of autonomy means that patients should be able to decide whether or not to undergo testing or treatment for anything. Thus, it is important to consider if patient intake forms and authorizations explain that the provider may use urinalysis for the purposes of treatment and the provider’s policies for responding to urinalysis results. These policies may include automatic discharge for patient use of illicit drugs.
Confidentiality is, of course, the other concern with these tests. A fully executed information release and HIPAA authorization form should always be on file before a test is executed. Remember, federal and state law include provide a heightened level of protection for patient health information related to substance abuse.
The issue of cost must also be considered. To avoid claims of deceptive billing practices or fraud, the procedure should be medically necessary and the patient should always be informed that they will be responsible for the cost of a procedure.
When performing these tests, providers should be familiar with specific drug screening statutes and regulations in their own state. State regulations might address issues such as chain of custody requirements, patient privacy, and how results may be used or shared. It is important for providers to have the proper intake form, policies and procedures in place before performing urinalysis. It may be a simple procedure, but it presents a myriad of issues that must be considered when providing patient care.
This article is intended as a summary of newly enacted state and federal law and does not constitute legal advice.